Words, help, gifts, time or touch: thirty quick either-or choices show what actually reaches you in one relationship, and what barely registers. Can’t choose? Mark it a tie.
Words, acts, remembered objects, focused time, and touch are practical response categories. The result describes this run; it does not assign a permanent identity.
Three steps. Name one relationship and a recent time window, then compare two concrete responses at a time.
hirty moments carry the reading. Every pair compares two response channels, and every channel pair appears three times. If the two options truly carry equal weight, a third tie response records that instead of inventing a preference.
Two concrete responses at a time. Every pairing of the five channels appears three times.
A clear pick adds one to that channel. A genuine tie is recorded separately and does not inflate either side.
All five counts, the number of ties, and the top-two gap remain visible. A top tie stays tied.
Honest answers to the four asked most often.
No. The five-channel structure is a practical vocabulary, not a validated psychometric scale. The balanced question source and scoring are auditable, but the interpretation remains contextual.
Compare the two reports without treating either as a rule. Ask which specific response would be legible this week, in this relationship.
Four minutes. Thirty single-tap choices, no signup, no email. Your reading is shareable as a URL and a pentagon chart.
It can. A different relationship, time window, or recent event can change the order. That is why the report names the context and avoids calling the result your identity.